|
What size should Jersey's public sector be? The answer depends
fundamentally on the view of the role of the state that one adopts.
Nevertheless, whatever your position on that question, information on
how Jersey compares with other places will be of some interest.
The most useful comparisons would factor in measures of results achieved
to give some indication of effectiveness or value for money. Such
sophisticated analysis would require extensive research and would depend
on finding some reasonable method of measuring results. This short
note summarises some basic analysis developed for other purposes. The
data is crude and looks only at inputs rather than results but nonetheless
suggests areas that might repay further investigation.
Taxation Revenue
Across the globe, most significant source of funding for the public sector
is taxation revenue. Jersey’s taxation revenue differs from that
of many industrialised nations and the continuing vitality of its economy,
in the face of the disadvantages faced by small islands, presently depends
significantly on an ability to maintain favourable taxation levels.
An interesting perspective in which to frame the relative resources available
to the States of Jersey might be constructed in terms of States taxation
revenue. Benchmarking must be undertaken with due caution as larger
nations have additional government responsibilities, not least among which
is defence expenditure (averaging some $540 per capita in OECD countries).
However, after adjusting for military expenditure and excluding social
security revenue which varies so widely from country to country, States
revenues per capita compares with developed nations as shown in the panel
below

This comparison suggests that, per capita, Jersey’s tax revenues are
on a par with OECD averages and in a close peer group comprising the United
Kingdom, Ireland, Canada and Italy. Crudely, if the island is achieving
value for money, one might therefore expect key social outcomes such as
educational attainment, health of the population, extent of deprivation
to compare with these peers. This comparable standard of public
services is of course the espoused aim of the States.
Small Community Comparison
On the other hand meeting the requirements of a small community may not
be closely comparable with a large nation due to economies and diseconomies
of scale. An alternative perspective is provided by comparisons
with other small self-governing communities. Comparisons of Jersey
with smaller territories are fraught with difficulty in that Jersey’s
economy is somewhat more advanced, global in reach and longer established
than other small self governing communities (Barbados, for example, is
an aid recipient). Jersey lies in a middle ground between, on the
one side, the advanced economies of the world, and small communities on
the other. To reflect both population and national income characteristics
the closest comparisons might be Cayman, Bermuda, Guernsey, Isle of Man
and Luxembourg. Each of these small communities has a significant
financial services industry, small population, comparatively high per
capita GNP in global terms and a small physical size. The table
below shows key indicators for each of these communities. Figures
must be treated with caution in that each territory operates differently.
For example, Guernsey's figures include Social Security contributions
(circa £40 million) whereas Jersey does not. On the other
hand, Jersey's figures include gross income from Telecommunications and
Postal Services (£66 million) rather than net contribution (£15
million).
| |
Population
|
1995 GNP per capita
|
Gov’t revenue
|
Gov’t revenue
|
| |
(‘000)
|
US$’000
|
(% of GDP)
|
$’000 per capita
|
|
Luxembourg
|
390
|
46
|
45
|
21
|
|
Jersey
|
85
|
28
|
28
|
8
|
|
Bermuda
|
63
|
30
|
21
|
6
|
|
Cayman
|
34
|
28
|
20
|
6
|
|
Guernsey
|
59
|
27
|
21
|
6
|
|
Isle of Man
|
70
|
13
|
39
|
5
|
Sources and Recommended Reading
For challenges facing small islands see UN Department for Policy Co-ordination
& Sustainable Development, Macroeconomic Policy Questions: Trade &
Development Annex Specific Measures in Favour of Small Island Economies,
which makes only passing reference to the role offshore financial services
has played as a developmental engine.
Jersey’s taxation revenue has been calculated as: taxation & impôts
£248m, Finance & Economics surplus £40m, traders surplus
£15m. All figures taken from States of Jersey Statistical
Review, 1997 pp54. Check the States
of Jersey website for figures on line.
Tax revenue for OECD countries has been derived from OECD
in Figures, OECD, 1998 and IISS Note that this comparison ignores
investment income of the States of Jersey (£7.8 million in 1996).
Further sources: Jersey: Statistical Review, 1997, Guernsey: 1998 Economic
& Statistics Review, Bermuda: 1997 Economic Review, Cayman: Economics
& Statistics Office, Isle of Man: Key Facts, 1996, World Development
Indicators, World Bank
|